ctrlINT What the industry said about every indicator, with the quote

CVE-2024-3094Vulnerability

Reported by 3 independent sources · first reported by Elastic Security Labs · last reported

Last reported 2 months ago

What the reports say

4 reports, newest first · the exact sentence from each
  1. “…spending years pretending to be helpful contributors just to hide backdoors in core software, as seen in the XZ Utils vulnerability (CVE-2024-3094).”

    Palo Alto Unit 42Vendor
    Connecting the Dots: Securing the Overlooked Corners of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) Supply Chain
  2. “XZ Utils is unfortunately a well-known case because of the CVE-2024-3094, when malicious code was discovered in some tarballs versions (5.6.0 and 5.6.1).”

    Sekoia.ioVendor
    Leveraging Landlock Telemetry for Linux Detection Engineering
  3. “Linux host infected with CVE-2024-3094 for supply chain simulation.”

    Elastic Security LabsVendor
    Automating GOAD and Live Malware Labs
  4. “CVE-2024-3094 explains how the changes in the liblzma were created from the malicious additions to the library’s build scripts and directly impacts any software that links the library on an impacted system.”

    Elastic Security LabsVendor
    500ms to midnight: XZ A.K.A. liblzma backdoor

Indicators reported together

named in the same reports
Copy these 8 indicators · defanged

Also named with it: CVE-2021-34527

Thanks — we review every report.

Report a wrong value
What is wrong with CVE-2024-3094 here?
No account needed. We do not store your IP address.